The Top 5 Podcast : Daniela Philips



Top 5 is back after a month or so being away.

Top 5 is a simple concept where @CinemaTronix grabs people off the internet and ask them and talk about their top 5 favorite films.

This episode I am joined by the lovely Daniela Phillips () and her choices.

We go through doomed romances, childhood nostalgia, muppets and how the streets of venice is a scary place at night. We even give Mrs Brown’s Boy’s a mention.

Give Daniela a follow on twitter and if you are interested in taking part yourself, drop me a line at ibastnerds@gmail or



Action Junkies Podcast : Comic Books and Rants

Welcome back to  another episode of The Action Junkies Podcast, hosted by Chris () and Jade ( ) and here we chat about action films and our love for the genre.

This episode we take a look at two of the most recent comic book sequels in Captain America : The Winter Soldier and The Amazing Spider-Man 2. We also take a detour mid way through that discuss DC’s recent efforts  and in turn figure out the hype machine and what makes a good movie.

Listeners bewarned, Fans of The Dark Knight should take caution when listening to this podcast…… But we highly suggest that you do and…… why so serious?

Next week we take on The Best of the Best where Jade will swoon some more over Eric (Silver Fox) Roberts.

Email us and follow us   on twitter and subscribe to us on



The Fault in Our Stars review by Barry Cox


Knowing full well the Fault in our Stars was going to tug on the heart strings, and possibly have me sniffling, head in arms, I thought I’d be a brave soul and venture with my Kleenex in hand, to the local cinema for a emotional thrashing regardless.

Shailene Woodley stars as Hazel Grace Lancaster, whom was diagnosed with type-4 thyroid cancer at a young age and is battling on like a trooper. Supported by her parents (Dern and Trammell), Hazel, who finds comfort in her solace, choosing to read a particular book over and over, that just happens to be about cancer, rather than anything much else.

Good old mum and doctor decide it would be good if she went to a support group where she can meet others of similar circumstances. Alas, she goes along complete with oxygen tank on wheels in tow. There she meets and begins a fluid, if slightly jovial friendship with Gus, a cancer patient who is in remission. Gus is full of dexterousness and benevolence, a trait that, whilst often worthy of eye rolling moments, really serves the character well.

As obvious as it is to say it, Hazel and Gus fall in love *insert ahs and coos here* and embark on a journey to Amsterdam (Holland, not New York) as Gus, the lovable fella that he is, has set up a meeting with Peter Van Houghton (Willem Dafoe), the author of Hazel’s favourite book. So, with the doctor’s disapproval, off they go to a city full of tulips and debauchery for fun and frolics.

I’ll leave the synopsis there. If that’s intrigued you, I suggest you stop reading now and go and see the film, as my thoughts below is about to upset the apple cart.

My one (big) problem with the film lies within its force-fed approach to the story. Yes, it was always going to be a difficult narrative to tackle, though the idea has merit, it’s in the execution the problems are evident.  The film’s soundtrack is as saccharine as they come. Chock-full of those exaggeratingly sentimental moments, helping those lodged tears embark on a journey down your face. Then there’s the way that Hazel speaks. As a teenager, I knew a few choice words, but not things like “…there’s nothing that can’t be fixed by a Peter Gabriel song”, and whilst I have quoted that out of context, the important thing is that this teenage girl is saying things like this and knows who Peter Gabriel is. Maybe she does, who am I to question what goes on in a teenagers world, it’s not like I was ever one once.

Ultimately by the films tear-jerking finale, (it’s not a spoiler, honest) the cinema was flooded with teenage tears, and tissues were strewn across the isles, and I was utterly done in by the hammer to the head, emotiveness of ‘The Fault in our Stars’. It really does wear its welcome out. A few good scenes aside and charming chemistry from the leads cannot save it from being anything more than an overly sentimental piece that doesn’t leave much of a lasting impression.

The 5 Reasons why I love George Clooney By Marcus Zizzou




When asked who my favourite Hollywood star is, I always find that a difficult question to answer. I’m a big fan of Brad Pitt. He’s had some fantastic iconic roles in Hollywood, the ripped Tyler Durden in Fight Club, the brooding Jesse James in the undervalued Assassination of Jesse James by the coward Robert Ford, the portrayal of Baseball GM Billy Bean in Moneyball….the list goes on and on. The ever young Leonardo DiCaprio maybe? He’s excellent In Revolutionary Road, Departed, Gatsby and even in the turgid slog Wolf of Wall Street his performance was top notch. But taking all things into account George is my man, the grey haired silver fox ticks all the boxes for me. He made his big break in E.R (1994-1999) and never looked back. Not many have successfully turned from a soap star into a Hollywood Legend, Demi Moore and Tommy Lee Jones notable exceptions.

1 STYLE The American

This slow burn Thriller is terribly underrated in my opinion. Clooney plays Jack/Edward, a specialist gun maker who works and lives alone. The film plays out in a sedate way, this is no James Bond or Bourne. It’s a sombre but weighty drama that keeps you gripped. Its absolute gorgeous to look at Martin Ruhe’s cinematography is impeccable here and Director Anton Corbijn continues his sterling work after Control, and I can’t wait for his upcoming film A Most Wanted Man. Clooney is controlled classy and understated.

2 VOICE Fantastic Mr Fox

I’m a massive fan of this film. Right up there for me in Wes Andersons locker. The set design is incredible. The book is one of my favourites and to see it transformed and enhanced is a delight, I wonder what Mr Dahl would of thought? Its Clooney’s silky drawl that carries this film along with some excellent support from Streep and Andersons usual pool of actors.(Murray Schwartzmann,Wilson,Dafoe) The score is wonderful from Desplat and it ties the room together perfectly.

3 COOL Ocean’s Eleven

Ocean’s Eleven, the 2001 Crime Thriller remake is fun, stylish and top class Blockbuster fayre. Super cool Danny Ocean leads his crew (including Pitt, Damon, Gould,C Affleck and Bernie Mac). Soderbergh wields his magic here to make it superior to Lewis Milestone’s 1960 original. This Heist movie sees Danny and his crew to try to pull off a 150 Million Dollar robbery from Casinos run by ruthless Terry Benedict ( slimy Andy Garcia) during a boxing match. Clooney is on excellent form here having a blast with his friend Pitt, Its paint by numbers stuff but done in an impeccable way.

4 HUMOUR O Brother Where Art Thou?

This 2000 humdinger of adventure comedy by the Coen’s is one of my favourites in this Genre. Loosely based on Homer’s Odyssey epic poem, Clooney plays Everett McGill, an escaped convict who leads a gang of 3 in search of a hidden treasure stash which will changed their miserable lives forever. This film is riddled with quotable lines and excellent performances. Clooney leads the way in an offbeat role, and once again he’s up to task with some brilliant ‘face acting’ and comic timing. The motley crew find themselves in difficult spots time and again and this leads us to some scenes that are right out of the top draw. The KKK, the baptism and the frog scenes spring to find as well as the Soggy bottom Boys. The Soundtrack is marvellous, Alison Krauss became a firm favourite of mine after seeing this.


Syriana is a captivating film about, oil and money and politics set in Iran. Clooney plays aging CIA agent Bob Barnes in this corruption thriller. The plot isn’t a easy one, interwoven stories, no solutions, double crossing it’s all here, but I found it totally enthralling to be in this hyper realistic film. Clooney put on 30lbs for the role apparently with bowls and bowls of pasta and also supports a huge beard. This dedication obviously paid off with a Oscar win for best supporting Actor. If you’re after a intelligent head scratcher then I suggest you look here.

Some other George Clooney films I hold in high regard are, MICHAEL CLAYTON, OUT OF SIGHT, UP IN THE AIR and THE DESCENDANTS

So Yes I love George, the truth will out.

Marcus Zizzou


5 Reasons Why ‘X-Men: Days Of Future Past’ Rocked My Proverbial Socks Off ***SPOILER WARNING***

By Scott Allden  



Grossing over $90 million dollars on its opening weekend in North America. ‘X-Men: Days Of Future  Past’, the 7th entry in the Fox Studios’ X-Men franchise, based on the Marvel comic book characters/  books of the same name – Has received global acclaim. And in my humble opinion – richly deserved.  Here are 5 reasons that Days Of Future Past absolutely killed it for me….. Killed is good in this  context, by the way.




1. THAT Quicksilver Scene.



Fuck, I really hate saying it that way. ‘THAT’ Quicksilver scene… Ugh. It’s a great moment for not   only the movie itself, but for the cast too who had really supported and pushed out just how good   Evan Peters’ performance as the mutant speedster was. Though we can all say how shite his character   design was (Singer….), it truly was a great demonstration of his abilities, his personality and the use   of pop culture – As Maximoff’s walkman plays out the delightfully apt ‘Time In A Bottle’ by Jim Croce.   Evan Peters’ performance throughout his time in the movie was no less greater. Leaving a lot for Joss   Whedon and Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s depiction of the character to live up to in ‘Avengers: Age Of   Ultron’.

2. Wolverine’s Role



Hugh Jackman – The cornerstone of the X-Men franchise. Appearing as a lead character in 6 of the 7   movies to date. With a cameo in First Class, simply because – because… Yeah.

I’ve always found issue with Logan in these movies. Not only are the movies marred by the sheer   amount of focus that is lavished on the character, alienating others. But also because it almost   becomes detrimental to the overall story. In DOFP, the movie progresses and develops through the   narrative and each character is a driving force for that. Though we closely and prominently follow   events and actions of certain characters – namely Charles (James McAvoy), Magneto (Michael   Fassbender) and Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence) – Wolverine is without question the lead. However he   is part of the story, rather than the story being a part of him. His scenes with Charles and Hank (Nick   Hoult) after his initial regression to 1973 are some of my favourite moments in the entire film. There’s   great chemistry between the 3, and this is much more apparent after Logan manages to convince   Charles to get his shit together. I also found the much maligned ‘swap’ between himself and Kitty   (Ellen Page) had proven to be a great move on the part of Singer and Kinberg.

3. The Screenplay

                                                                                                                "X-Men: Days Of Future Past" World Premiere - Outside Arrivals


Simple as it seems. And is… Simon Kinberg wrote one damn good movie. Within the X-Men   community, I’d argue that First Class is the superior film based on writing – Perhaps due to the more   traditional, linear plot. With DOFP, there is so much going on that you could easily be stepping into   Last Stand territory. It just felt from watching though, that everything had its place within the story –   it was relevant, cohesive, served purpose and ultimately wasn’t wasteful fanboy nonsense thrown in   for acknowledgement. I’d wholeheartedly recommend a second viewing if this wasn’t your immediate   conclusion.

4. The ‘Reset’



Spoilers ahead. Of course, you’ve all seen the movie by now? Before production had completed, director Bryan Singer went on record to say that the beauty of time travel movies is that there is scope to undo, change or get rid of certain elements from the established timeline. In other words – He brought back Cyclops and Jean! So what does that mean for future appearances for people like James Marsden, Famke Janssen and Kelsey Grammar? Well we know now that younger versions of original trilogy characters will appear in the next movie ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’. Though we’ll never know for certain until that time, it was still great to see those characters back  – almost a sigh of relief. Especially after the massive injustice done to Cyclops.

5. Groundwork For The Future



Though I was pretty disappointed in the shelving of half the cast of First Class. Carrying over James  McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence and Nick Hoult to DOFP in hindsight is a great   sign of potential things to come. With Charles and Hank seemingly becoming more reliant on each   other from events prior to the movie, and Erik and Mystique being ‘set loose’ essentially to build ‘The   Brotherhood’. We could potentially see some great stories featuring these characters at loggerheads   once again. Because of the dynamics and events that have occurred within the relationships of these 4   – I think we should anticipate for much more emotionally driven, tense and personal X-Men sequels.   Here’s to 2016, and ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ .

The Bastnerds are back Baby back


The Bastnerds are back once again after taking some time off (What again?).. and this time we are multitasking by watching the world cup.

Well when I say WE I mean Scott @Celluloidical and Ian @i_nesbot while I @CinemaTronix watch some film with Chuck Norris in.

So in this episode I explain the concept of the renaming and the idea of The Geek Soapbox. We catch up with the things we have seen over the last couple of months.

Scott realises he didn’t like the last Muppet movie and explains the continuity of X-Men Days of Future Past and more talk about The Lego Movie and some thoughts about the new Godzilla movie.

All that and much more…. please feel free to follow us on twitter, we’re quite chatty and usually reply back.

You can send your comments and feedback or if you like to join us and take part in one of our podcasts then send an email to and stay tuned for more banter in the podcast form and some more commentary tracks and Top 5’s.

Thanks for listening and enjoy.


The Action Junkies : Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter

We’re back yet again after some more time off. We will try and keep these up dates as regular as possible but for now we are back yet again talking about the video game double bill Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter.

There is some disagreement about Street Fighter but then again that’s to be expected when a certain Mr Van Damme’s involved.

Chris  and Jade  also ramble on some more and even Chris goes on a rant about the general attitude towards Stallone.

Please follow us on Twitter  and don’t forget to email us

Next episode we will get all comic book on your ass with Captain America 2 and The Amazing Spiderman 2

Watch this space.


Chef : Review by Daniel Burden

Review by Daniel Burden 

I love the big summer event movies. They’re loud, full of explosions, bombastic, switch your brain off

fun. We’ve had a few already this year, and I can’t wait for the next Transformers. Dinobots? On the

big screen? Things go bang? I’m there on opening night.

However, it doesn’t hurt to slow down. And considering Jon Favreau last two films were Iron Man

2 and Cowboys & Aliens, big casts, big budgets and big explosions, to see him go back to something

simpler and more personal is a genuine joy to behold. It’s easy to forget that’s he’s one of the most

talented actor/directors in the business, and Chef shows off everything he has to offer.

We’re not quite in Swingers territory here, there’s nothing hugely revolutionary about Chef, but what

we get is a near perfect feel good movie.

In front of the camera Favreau plays the titular chef Carl Casper, a talented but creatively frustrated

head chef at a restaurant run by Dustin Hoffman (who is just one of the hugely famous supporting

cast), and after a bad review from a critic, he engages in a Twitter war and becomes a viral celebrity.

This doesn’t go well for the unprepared Casper, and he soon finds himself out of a job and at a loose

end, essentially working as a nanny for his own son, who he barely has a relationship with. What

Favreau has to say about social media is all spot on, how quickly the public can turn on you, and also

what a wonderful tool it can be, even if it is a little on the nose. You get the feeling this aspect, and

the movie in general, are a reaction from Favreau in regards to his own poor reviews.

The second half is very much a road movie, when Casper, along with his son, and best friend played

with a delightful energy by John Leguizamo, after buying a van and selling Cuban sandwiches across

the country.

It’s not a premise that immediately screams “Watch Me!” But it totally works. And the food! I

guarantee this movie will make you hungry, I was sitting salivating in my seat. This is the best movie

about cooking and food that I have ever seen. Not that I’ve seen all that many.

The supporting cast include, the aforementioned Dustin Hoffman, Sofia Vegara, Oliver Platt, Scarlett

Johansson and a near movie stealing cameo from Robert Downey Jr. But this is Jon Favreau’s movie.

He’s the heart at the centre of the whole thing, a career best performance in terms of acting and

directing. His character goes through a transformation in this movie, and in way so does Favreau,

he’s no longer the man who struggle through Iron Man 2 and was clearly disinterested Cowboys &

Aliens, Chef is a deeply personal film and it shows.

So you can go and see giant robots fighting, or giant monsters fighting, or giant robots fighting giant

robots. Or, why not catch Chef. It’s genuinely funny and heartwarming, chocked full of wonderful

performances from a hugely talented cast.

This is the kind of movie I want Jon Favreau to keep making, he may have brought the Marvel

cinematic universe to life, but this smaller stuff, a movie about people, relationships (and gorgeous

food you can almost taste) is his best work.

More of this please Jon!


Chef hits UK screens on 25th of June..

22 Jump Street : Review by Tomas Ward

Review by Tomas Ward @IngloriousTward

Comedy is the hardest genre to get right. There’s definitely no question about it. It has to be self-deprecating whilst also original. Funny but not too full of itself. The sign of a good comedy is in the writing. Contemporary comedy is far different to what it used to be. It’s done what every comedy should do and satirize the current culture of the world. In 2012, 21 Jump Street was released to universal acclaim and went on to become one of the biggest surprises of the year. A remake of the TV series that launched Johnny Depp’s career, 21 Jump Street shocked everyone with its ability to be both genuinely hilarious and charming all at the same time. Jonah Hill played himself which wasn’t a bad thing and it found a new niche for Channing Tatum, who completely embraced his role as wonderfully deadpan and willing to take the piss out himself. Putting the two together was genius in disguise. So here we are. A sequel was inevitable.

Welcome to 22 Jump Street.

Picking up where the original left off, our heroes Jenko and Schmidt are once again assigned to work within the Jump Street program and to undergo a undercover operation almost identical to the last one, except this time they have to go to college. Rarely are comedy sequels good but what sets 22 Jump Street away from the rest is how it consistently makes jokes at its own expense whilst bringing something new to the table. It’s incredibly self-deprecating and the “Do-exactly-the-same-as-the-last-time” approach is brilliant. It’s amazing how you don’t tire of the joke because Hill has found so many ways in his screenplay to mine for humour. And it certainly works. There’s too many moments to name for praise but it’s safe to say I wasn’t disappointed.

22 Jump Street is a rare comedy sequel that surpasses it’s predecessor in so many ways. It’s consistently funny and satirical. Hill and Tatum are a perfect double act and the post-credits sequence will have you in stitches. The best comedy in ages..

Of Horses and Men (Hross I Oss) : Review by Tracey A-M

Review by Tracey A-M  







Director: Benedikt Erlingsson

Cast: Ingvar Eggert Sigurðsson; Charlotte Bøving

Running Time: 81 Minutes


Iceland’s submission for the Best Foreign Language Film at the 85th Academy Awards

is indeed a delightful curiosity: an anthology of interwoven stories giving us a wry and

affectionate examination of the symbiotic relationships between man, horse and the barren,

volcanic Icelandic landscape.

Of Horses and Men is set in a rural community populated by eccentric characters and the

equine companions around which their lives so heavily revolve.

In opening tale we meet Kolbeinn (Sigurðsson), who seems to be quite the pin up for the

local housewives, as he readies both himself and his long-lashed, silver mare to tentatively

woo neighbour, Solveig (Bøving). In what is just the first of the absurd images within the

film, Kolbeinn vainly parades through the community, head held high, relishing the attention

he seems to be garnering from the locals. His horse, which looks slightly small for him,

prancing proudly as his overlong legs almost reach the ground. The rendezvous goes well,

not only for the middle aged love birds, but for their horses too, as Solveig’s lustful stallion,

Brown, is quite taken with Kolbeinn’s horse, leading to humiliation, tragic measures and a

bump in the course of true love.

Other strands, all of which are wonderfully dark, include a foolhardy oceanic mission by the

local drunk to acquire lethal-strength alcohol from a Russian freight ship, a neighbourhood

feud that escalates into tragedy and a mountainous trek in which a young Spaniard finds

himself in an Empire Strikes Back style survival dilemma.

Benedikts Erlingson’s debut feature forgoes unnecessary dialogue, relying on a quirky

soundtrack of Scandinavian folk music to set the scene and reinforce the sense of tradition

in the activities. The equine stars are as much a part of the cast and given the same screen

time as their human counterparts, rather than being impassive animal extras, each horse

is imbued with their own individual personality. The landscape itself is also an integral

part of the film, the stunning, panoramic cinematography accentuating the isolation of

the community. Of Horses and Men is sometimes tragic, sometimes touching, but always

brimming with humour.

Rating: 8/10.